October 31, 2008
Web Extra! Walsh Says Murdered Anchor Was Raped
"America's Most Wanted" host John Walsh sat down with Lisa Breckenridge after "Good Day LA" to talk more about his upcoming show. He revealed that according to his sources, 26-year-old news anchor, Anne Pressly, was beaten and raped in her home. So far authorities have refused to say whether she was sexually assaulted. ”America's Most Wanted” will highlight the case this Saturday’s episode.
How many more White women need be the victim of savage Black violence before we stand up for them? Our mothers, sisters, girlfriends and wives, this is who is at risk. This poor woman suffered the tortures of the damned and the media in it's quest for racial egalitarianism has not reported the truth. As in so many other cases, the facts of this case are conveniently left out to keep the public in blissful ignorance. Stop the media cover-up of Black on White crimes, and help America learn what is really going on.
Pressly later died in the hospital days after the attack, reportedly without regaining consciousness after being found dying in her bed by her mother the next morning. No suspects have been arrested. The controlled media, including her co-workers at Little Rock’s Channel 7 ABC affiliate, have joined police in calling the attack “random”, but new reports now conflict with their official story of what happened to the beautiful blonde, a local celebrity.
White Revolution has just been informed, from a source indirectly connected to the medical examiner who completed the autopsy, that Anne Pressly was sexually assaulted by two black males, based on DNA found at the scene and on her body. Furthermore, rather than having been simply beaten as the controlled media reports, WR has been told that she was cut on her face and private areas with a knife in a gruesome mutilation.
The autopsy report is most likely not going to be made available to the public, even through the Freedom Of Information Act, until the investigation is officially closed. Or, like Martin Luther King, Jr.’s F.B.I. file, never, if they so choose.
Pressly was last seen prior to the attack at a party the night before, around 10:30 p.m.. Whom might she have met at this party? Did they follow her home?
Anyone having further information about the true nature of the attack, or the identity of her attackers, is urged to come forward at this time.
October 31, 2008
After the last week of market disasters and scenes of mobs clamoring for just a glimpse of Barack Hussein Obama, I had all of these thoughts fresh in my mind as I ended my radio show and finally fell asleep last Saturday. My last conscious thoughts were of the dark clouds coming ashore in America and what our response to martial law, shortages, imprisoned patriots, and riots would be......
I seemed to be present as military leaders exclaimed during heated campaigns, over the great map of America, “the battle lines are becoming clear.” I saw riflemen on the field of combat as they whispered to each other at four a.m., “I can smell ‘em coming.” The meaning was the same. All hell was about to break out. Indeed my fellow patriots, constitutionalists, and true citizens of the failing Republic, HELL IS staring you in the eyeballs.
As much as it has truly pained me to the core, I have come to the irreconcilable fact that on Election Day, the line will be drawn. We will no longer argue amicably about politics or the latest imbecilic actions occurring in Washington, our statehouses, or in court rooms. We are considering for the first time in our lives, the unthinkable. That is, my neighbor, my associates in the office, my cousin, or my fellow citizen has become my potential enemy. They have betrayed me and what is left of my grandfather’s country.
I am faced with the certain realization that no matter how I may try to sugar coat it, this time -- those who voted or supported the socialist left, the democrats, the liberals, the “elitists” in the universities and business, the apostate “liberation theology” or do nothing church, and politics everywhere--are my enemy. It can be stated in no other terms. That’s a fact, Jack.
To all those who have supported the constant killing of the unborn, entitlements for those who don’t deserve them, for assisting undocumented illegals, to corrupted politicians, sanctuary cities, to USDA agents forcing the implantation of chips into the livestock herds of America, to those pushing social security numbers and locator chips on newborns, to thieves who forced an unconstitutional income tax on “sovereign” American workers, for the loss of privacy, the restraint of second amendment natural rights, to BATFE master search and arrest warrants, to SWAT teams and Taser Thugs in every hamlet in the land, to all of the homosexual rights fanatics and bullies who use their perverted lifestyles to intimidate my grandchildren in school and in the parks, to drug dealers who employ minority kids in Obama’s south Chicago neighborhoods, and the young men and women in our military who are now mercenaries trained to rove our streets when the first shots are fired and produce body counts similar to the ones in Iraq, you have become my potential enemy.
The despicable power mad scurrilous maggots who have created this mess deserve a hole in hell deeper than the rest. They have already destroyed my family’s national ideals, my community’s cohesion, and our collective futures. They have aided and abetted the national calamity that has unfolded during the past seven weeks. The banks and investment houses, the stock market and derivatives, have all waltzed us off the pier into a thousand feet of cold dark water from which there is no return. The bankers, still standing safely on the wharf, have begged us in the water to throw them our lifejackets so that we can drown while they offer to sell us back the life vests we already had. In the meantime they ordered lobster while we dined on saltwater. Is this absurd picture, clear and painful enough?
In no small measure this IS the America we inhabit at this moment. While I do not know at this time who will be elected, I suspect it may well be Barack Hussein Obama. If that is the case, then my opening premise is correct. Those of you who have anointed this socialist, Muslim sympathizing, gun rights hating, Mexican illegals embracing, abortion loving charmer as POTUS, you are not only the most stupid generation of Americans who have ever lived, you are the most dangerous. You have single-handedly embraced your own destruction. For including me in that, I detest your actions and see you as my enemy. What else can I think?
Am I picking a fight? Pretty much. Might as well, one’s coming down the street anyway. You have been warned. You have been told of the consequences of your actions. McCain is not the answer, no matter how “appealing” Sarah Palin might appear. Chuck Baldwin is the only candidate that deserves my vote. Chuck can and will do the job and we can thank God Almighty that he is in the running. Vote what is right, not what you think is your only choice. Baldwin’s Constitutional Party is the only truly American party that is left. All the others are wasted losers and nut jobs.
American patriots you need to decide what your battle plans are. You can not wait any longer. Are you stored up? Are you prayed up? Have you stayed up figuring it all out? Have you decided that the time has come for you to take that same principled stand that your founders took to establish this FREE nation in the first place? Have you decided who your true enemies are? Are you tired of the bankers running it, ruining it and then demanding we pay up for their greed? Are you sick over this nation finalizing its socialistic stance nationalizing the infrastructure of the county and Obama as an open socialist/communist/radical presidential candidate? Will you resist the “state’s” efforts to take you in and deprive you of your freedoms? Will you try to work with patriotic police officers and American armed forces that will fight with you? Will you stand firm when they shut off your supplies? Will you resist in the cold and in the dark? Will you go all the way to a constitutional victory? Can you dress your own wounds? Can you jog a half mile? Will you be able to live without commonplace things you have grown accustomed to having any time you wanted them?
Minutemen and the militia were responsible for their own arms, ammunition and supplies. Can you muster with others and provide the essentials? Can you carry all that you need for two to three days at a time? Can you sleep with your back to a tree on cold, wet ground? Can you be still for an hour or two just watching and listening? How will you communicate with your fellow patriots—safely? When the bad guys start shooting, what will you do? Will you give away your position by firing randomly to “scare” them off? Will you remain defensive and not set yourself up for being killed? Will you learn how to move with stealth? Can you disarm someone and take them as a prisoner? What then? Have you organized with others to defend what is yours and theirs? Can you shoot and then seek good cover so you can survive another shot? Do you have a back-up retreat line and then another so that you can get out when you have to? Do you take your wounded with you? How? It’s not like the movies. When martial law is declared, can you and will you do these things or will you be rounded up by the hundreds of thousands each day? Many will resist for about as long as it took you to eat lunch. This is the new reality, friends. It may soon be your own personal reality as well.
Ultimately, the bad guys are counting on you being weak, uncommitted, and afraid. They want you to believe that their superiority in initial numbers, training and equipment will take you out in minutes. Let me tell you something confidential. American police officers are used to overwhelming criminal groups of one, two, three, or four. Not twenty, thirty, fifty or one hundred determined well armed citizens who are otherwise first class community stand-outs. A whole department of twenty-five officers would not stand a chance against one hundred solid minutemen.
I do not want it to come to that, but those are real scenarios. Muster five hundred or a thousand and an entire state police department is going to need regular army troops with air assault assets to have a chance. AND THEY KNOW IT! Multiply patriot numbers 1000 times that and the good guys win! Then we rebuild………at least that is where I saw it going.
Foreign troops? So what? They understand determined resistance and the costs involved for their side as well. You’ll have Green Berets fighting with you if that happens. Where the good guys lose, is when they don’t organize, think, and carry out precision guided strategies. Guerilla warfare is well planned and executed.
About the time I imagined a real rout of these traitorous snakes, I realized my twilight sleep was bringing me back to the real world. I had a strange mix of apprehension, relief, excitement and dread all in the same moment. The worst feeling though, was of the great loss of potential that this nation held for so many decades. I realized what we had done to the efforts of so many Americans who fought and died believing they were doing it for an America that was true to its heritage. I looked out my window to see peace and solitude---for the moment. My day long prayer was that it will remain peaceful, but I fear that we are--in the words of those seasoned command officers--seeing the battle lines being drawn very clearly, now. And like that entrenched rifleman I, too, “can smell ‘em coming.”
Sure am glad it was all---------------------------just a dream.
" Mr Haider’s popularity extended beyond Carinthia, the alpine region he governed for years and to which he retreated after setbacks in Vienna, was confirmed as recently as September. In general elections, the Alliance for the Future of Austria (BZO) – the splinter group he formed after falling out with the Freedom party in 2005 – almost tripled its vote to 11 per cent.
The Freedom party itself, now headed by Heinz-Christian Strache, a Haider protégé, performed as spectacularly, gaining 18 per cent of the vote. Together, almost one in three Austrians chose the far right. Young voters, particularly the 16-18-year-olds enfranchised for the first time under electoral laws lowering the voting age, were particularly supportive: more than 44 per cent of 16-19-year-olds backed the Freedom party, as did more than 33 per cent of all voters below 30.
Such strong support reflected the popularity of the rhetoric, charisma and the ability to capitalise on popular discontent of Austria’s far right leaders – in spite of a standard of living and employment rate that are the envy of many European Union neighbours.
The far right’s resilience in Austria owes something to the native conservatism of a small, mountainous country, where traditional rural values and the Catholic church remain influential. “Apart from eight years in the 1970s, when Social Democrats enjoyed an absolute majority, Austria has always had a centre-right political orientation. Austria is a conservative country,” says Peter Filzmaier, a top political commentator. "
* denotes editors comment
If Barack Obama is not a socialist(*international communist), he does the best imitation of one I've ever seen.
Under his tax plan, the top 5 percent of wage-earners have their income tax rates raised from 35 percent to 40 percent, while the bottom 40 percent of all wage-earners, who pay no income tax, are sent federal checks.
If this is not the socialist redistribution of wealth, what is it?
A steeply graduated income tax has always been the preferred weapon of the left for bringing about socialist equality. Indeed, in the "Communist Manifesto" of 1848, Karl Marx was himself among the first to call for "a heavy progressive or graduated income tax."
The Obama tax plan is pure Robin Hood class warfare: Use the tax power of the state to rob the successful and reward the faithful. Only in Sherwood Forest it was assumed the Sheriff of Nottingham and his crowd had garnered their wealth by other than honest labor.
"Spread the wealth," Barack admonished Joe the Plumber.
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need," said old Karl in 1875. When Barbara West of WFTV in Orlando, Fla., put the Marx quote to Biden, however, Joe recoiled in spluttering disbelief.
West: "You may recognize this famous quote: 'From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.' That's from Karl Marx. How is Sen. Obama not being a Marxist if he intends to spread the wealth around?"
Biden: "Are you joking? Is this a joke?"
Biden's better defense, however, might have be the "u quoque!" retort: "You, too!"——the time-honored counter-charge of hypocrisy.
Indeed, how do Republicans who call Obama a socialist explain their support for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, welfare and the Earned Income Tax Credit? What are these if not government-mandated transfers of wealth to the middle and working class, and the indigent and working poor?
Since August, the Bush-Paulson team has seized our biggest S&L, Washington Mutual, and largest insurance company, AIG. It has nationalized Fannie and Freddie, pumped scores of billions into our banks, bailed out GM, Ford and Chrysler, and paid the $29 billion dowry for Bear Stearns to enter its shotgun marriage with JPMorgan Chase.
And with federal, state and local taxes taking a third of gross domestic product, and government regulating businesses with wage-and-hour laws, civil rights laws, environmental laws, and occupational health and safety laws, what are we living under, if not a mixed socialist-capitalist system?
Norman Thomas is said to have quit running for president on the Socialist ticket after six campaigns because the Democratic Party had stolen all his ideas and written them into its platforms.
Did Ike repeal the New Deal? Did Richard Nixon roll back the Great Society? Nope. He funded the Great Society. Did Ronald Reagan cut federal spending? Nope, defense spending soared. Bill Clinton slashed defense, but George Bush II set social spending records with No Child Left Behind and prescription drug benefits for the elderly under Medicare. Surpluses vanished, deficits returned, the national debt almost doubled.
Is the old republic then dead and gone, in the irretrievable past? Are we engaged in an argument settled before we were born?
In his 1938 essay "The Revolution Was," Garet Garrett wrote:
"There are those who think they are holding the pass against a revolution that may be coming up the road. But they are gazing in the wrong direction. The revolution is behind them. It went by in the Night of DeDepression, singing songs to freedom."
Nevertheless, there is a difference not just of degree but of kind between unemployment compensation for jobless workers, welfare for destitute families, and confiscating the income of taxpayers who earned it—to hand out to chronic tax consumers who did not.
This last is the socialism Winston Churchill called "the philosophy of envy and gospel of greed." And it is this suggestion of socialist ideology in Obama's words that has produced the belated pause by a nation that seemed to be moving into his camp. What did Barack say in 2001?
He spoke of the inadequacy of the courts as institutions to bring about "redistributive change" in society, of the "tragedy" of the civil rights movement in losing sight of the "political and organizing activities on the ground that are able to bring about the coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change."
Normal people don't talk like that. Socialists do.
This is ideology speaking. This is the redistributionist drivel one hears from cosseted college radicals and the "Marxist professors" Obama says in his memoir he sought out at the university. It is the language of social parasites like William Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn and Father Pfleger.
Enforced egalitarianism entails the death of excellence. For it seizes the rewards that excellence earns and turns them over to politicians and bureaucrats for distribution to the mediocrities upon whose votes they depend. One need not be Ayn Rand to see that Barack has picked up from past associates utopian notions that have ever produced nightmare states.
All fair-minded Americans understand that race should not be a factor in choosing our next president.
So why should race continue to play a role in deciding who gets into college or receives a government contract or is hired or promoted in a government job? It makes no sense to argue that we're supposed to be colorblind in the polling booth but color-conscious in so many other areas.
On Election Day, voters in Colorado and Nebraska will have the opportunity to end this racial double standard by approving amendments to their state constitutions that will outlaw racial preferences in state education, contracting and employment. Polls suggest that these ballot initiatives will pass easily. It's about time.
The Celts celebrated Halloween as Samhain, ‘All Hallowtide’ - the ‘Feast of the Dead’, when the dead revisited the mortal world. The celebration marked the end of Summer and the start of the Winter months.
During the eighth century the Catholic Church designated the first day of November as ‘All Saints Day’ (’All Hallows’) - a day of commemoration for those Saints that did not have a specific day of remembrance. The night before was known as ‘All Hallows Eve’ which, over time, became known as Halloween.
Here are the most notable Irish Halloween Traditions:
Colcannon for Dinner: Boiled Potato, Curly Kale (a cabbage) and raw Onions are provided as the traditional Irish Halloween dinner. Clean coins are wrapped in baking paper and placed in the potato for children to find and keep.
The Barnbrack Cake: The traditional Halloween cake in Ireland is the barnbrack which is a fruit bread. Each member of the family gets a slice. Great interest is taken in the outcome as there is a piece of rag, a coin and a ring ineach cake. If you get the rag then your financial future is doubtful. If you get the coin then you can look forward to a prosperous year. Getting the ring is a sure sign of impending romance or continued happiness.
The Ivy Leaf: Each member of the family places a perfect ivy leaf into a cup of water and it is then left undisturbed overnight. If, in the morning, a leaf is still perfect and has not developed any spots then the person who placed the leaf in the cup can be sure of 12months health until the following Halloween. If not…..
The Pumpkin: Carving Pumpkins dates back to the eighteenth century and to an Irish blacksmith named Jack who colluded with the Devil and was denied entry to Heaven. He was condemned to wander the earth but asked the Devil for some light. He was given a burning coal ember which he placed inside a turnip that he had gouged out.
Thus, the tradition of Jack O’Lanterns was born - the bearer being the wandering blacksmith - a damned soul. Villagers in Ireland hoped that the lantern in their window would keep the wanderer away. When the Irish emigrated in their millions to America there was not a great supply of turnips so pumpkins were used instead.
Halloween Costumes: On Halloween night children would dress up in scary costumes and go house to house. ‘Help the Halloween Party’ and ‘Trick or Treat’ were the cries to be heard at each door. This tradition of wearing costumes also dates back to Celtic times. On the special night when theliving and the dead were at their closest the Celtic Druids would dress up in elaborate costumes to disguise themselves as spirits and devils in case they encountered other devils and spirits during the night. By disguising they hoped that they would be able to avoid being carried away at the end of the night. This explains why witches, goblins and ghosts remain the most popular choices for the costumes.
Snap Apple: After the visits to the neighbours the Halloween games begin,the most popular of which is Snap Apple. An apple is suspended from a string and children are blindfolded. The first child to get a decent bite of the apple gets to keep their prize. The same game can be played by placing apples in a basin of water and trying to get a grip on the apple without too much mess!
The Bonfire: The Halloween bonfire is a tradition to encourage dreams of who your future husband or wife is going to be. The idea was to drop a cutting of your hair into the burning embers and then dream of you future loved one. Halloween was one of the Celt ‘fire’ celebrations.
Blind Date: Blindfolded local girls would go out into the fields and pull up the first cabbage they could find. If their cabbage had a substantial amount of earth attached to the roots then their future loved one would have money. Eating the cabbage would reveal the nature of their future husband - bitter or sweet!
Another way of finding your future spouse is to peel an apple in one go. If done successfully the single apple peel could be dropped on the floor to reveal the initials of the future-intended.
Anti-Fairy Measures: Fairies and goblins try to collect as many souls as they can at Halloween but if they met a person who threw the dust from under their feet at the Fairy then they would be obliged to release any souls that they held captive.
Holy water was sometimes anointed on farm animals to keep them safe during the night. If the animals were showing signs of ill health on All Hallows Eve then they would be spat on to try to ward off any evil spirits.
What I state in this column is my opinion and mine alone. I don't have any concrete underpinning, written evidence, statistics or other data to back up what I'm saying, just a foreboding sense of future events under certain circumstances.
And for the benefit of you cherry pickers who try to parse my words at every opportunity the key word is ultra.
Did you ever stop and think what the endgame of an ultra liberal agenda would be?
We already know that the philosophy leans heavily in the direction of socialism and monolithic government that would maintain control over every aspect of our lives.
We already know there is a move afoot to silence the talk radio hosts who disagree with the liberals, using a antiquated piece of tripe called the "Fairness Doctrine", which would require radio stations to allow a liberal voice for every conservative one.
This actually amounts to broadcast totalitarianism as the left already controls the three major networks, CNN, MSNBC and PBS. They want it all.
It's easy for any thinking person to see that this would completely ruin talk radio as liberal talk hosts have never been successful on the air and allowing them equal time would cause people to stop listening, which is exactly what the left wants.
As it is, free market forces govern the content of talk radio and it should stay that way.
We know that an ultra liberal agenda has absolutely no compassion for unborn children. How much imagination does it take to look at a policy that would euthanize babies with serious infirmities after birth?
After partial birth abortion, it's the logical next step. What's the difference in murdering a baby in the birth canal or when it comes out of the birth canal?
And what about senior citizens who are past the age and condition of being productive members of society, taking up space in hospitals and nursing homes, causing a drain on the budget.
Joe Biden has already said that we should be patriotic and pay more taxes. How far do you have to stretch that attitude to imagine somebody saying that people who are too infirm to perform any useful task should do their patriotic duty and die and that there would be a bureaucracy formed to decide who should be euthanized and when?
Barrack said we should spread the wealth around. Another bad liberal idea. It's been tried in Russia, Cuba, all the Eastern Bloc countries and they've all been dismal failures. Even the totalitarian government of China saw the light after hundreds of years and resorted to a degree of capitalism.
Spreading the wealth sounds good to people at the bottom of the economic ladder until, too late, they realize that spreading the wealth around takes away the ability of their employers to hire them and in many cases results in their jobs being exported out of the country.
I will make you one more dire prediction. If and when the liberals take over the health care of this nation it will be the biggest mess on Earth since the Tower of Babel.
There is only one thing the government is good at, spending somebody else's money.
Don't look for all the things I have mentioned to happen all at once, Satan, after all, is very good at being a snake and you all know how patient and sneaky a snake is.
Liberalism can't stand the bright light of truth.
And the truth shall set you free.
What do you think?
Pray for our troops
God bless America
October 24, 2008
October 30, 2008
October 29, 2008
The occasion drew leading nationalists from across Europe, among them Italian Member of the European Parliament Roberto Fiore, who predicted an impending crisis for globalism that will mirror the world changing events of the collapse of communism.
"We don't see ourselves as superior," Carney said, in a recent interview, "and we don't promote violence. You can't intimidate people into thinking the way you do."
New Panthers' war on whites
* On whites: "I'm about the total destruction of white people. I'm about the total liberation of black people. I hate white people. I hate my enemy. . . ."
Who is the racist again?
A speechwriter for Obama, Edwards, and Clinton on why she’s voting McCain.
Since I started writing speeches more than ten years ago, I have always believed in the Democratic Party. Not anymore. Not after the election of 2008. This transformation has been swift and complete and since I’m a woman writing in the election of 2008, “very emotional.”
When I entered this campaign, it was at the 2006 Edwards staff Christmas party. My nametag read “Millie Worker.” When former Senator John Edwards read it, he laughed and said, “That makes you like my parent.” He went on to say, “Would you please come down to Chapel Hill so we can talk about what’s coming up.” I sat in John and Elizabeth’s living room for two and half hours. I left North Carolina, energized about politics for the first time in months.
Barney Frank: People Are Blaming Me For the Subprime Crisis Because I'm Gay, and Not Because I Blocked Reform and Determined We Should "Roll the Dice in Favor of Affordable Housing"
Frank yesterday dismissed McCain's words as "an appeal to prejudice" that he said reminded him of past Republican efforts to raise voter concerns about the prospect of congressmen Charles Rangel and John Conyers, who are black, becoming committee chairs.
"I'm flattered by this," said Frank, who is gay. "But I don't think I'm the single most important member of the House after Nancy Pelosi. There are also a lot of straight white men who are committee chairmen."
Not only that, he's claiming he's actually led the attempts to reform the supbrime market.
His "reform" consisted entirely of his idee fixe -- limiting pay for CEOs.
Here are some of Barney Frank's -- and his Democratic friends' -- attempts at "reform."
"This hearing is about the political lynching of Franklin Raines."
Well. If Barney Frank isn't accusing people of homophobia, his allies on the committee are accusing people of racism.
And ACORN... Racist.
You Know Who's Not Homophobic? The financial industry, Barney Frank's top source of money in 2008.
October 29, 2008
As I write, little more than a week remains before E-Day, on which most Americans will vote. Nerves are being fearfully wracked. Even people who are usually somnolent say they can’t take the stress. There is a real danger that, unaddressed, the frustration of choosing between a Communist illegal alien raised by a Communist sex pervert and a POW traitor who is a Soviet front man could lead to an epidemic of Acid Reflux Disease or even an outbreak of Restless Leg Syndrome.
The purpose of this modest piece is to reassure you. Stop tormenting yourself. Further self-flagellation is pointless. Your next President has already been selected. Didn’t you know? Sure, go ahead and vote if you like, if you have nothing else to do, if you don’t mind standing in long lines between Obamatron morons and McCrud zombies, but enjoy the reassurance of knowing that the powers above Ponzi Paulson and Helicopter Ben Bernanke and Co. have already made their choice.
He is Zbigniew Brzezinski. What? Who? Is this some kind of Polish joke? Sadly, it is not. The lustiest enjoyer of Polish jokes in my experience was a remarkably gorgeous Polish lady I knew many years ago in the Bay Area. Every couple of years, I would come through on a speaking tour and she would press me for the latest Polish jokes I had heard. Again Zbigniew Brzezinski is not one of them. He is not just a victim of partial vowel deprivation.
In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote a book entitled Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era (New York, Viking Press). Let’s browse through it to find out what Zbigniew is. Zbig dedicates the book to Ian, Mark and Mika, his kids. A nice touch, don’t you think? He’s a family man. Starting on page 72 of my Penguin edition, he explains “why Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man’s universal vision.”
Marxism is “a victory of reason over belief. . . . To a greater extent than any previous mode of political thinking, Marxism puts a premium on the systematic and rigorous examination of material reality and on guides to action derived from that examination.” In other words, Marxism is a better system than our own. Marxism examines material reality and recommends action better than does the U.S. Constitution.
Page 83: Marxism “represented a major advance in man’s ability to conceptualize his relationship to his world.” It carried “an essentially ethical message.” It “was derived from a totally rational method of inquiry.” P. 123: Marxism “provided a unique intellectual tool for understanding and harnessing the fundamental forces of our time. . . . [I]t supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality; it infused political action with strong ethical elements . . . .”
By the way, as you see, I am making it easy for you. I am digging out the juicy nuggets. They are embedded in a prose the pompous turgidity of which recalls Isabel Paterson’s comment that the writing of John Foster Dulles compels the eyeball to rebound from the page. Subjecting the normal mind to such an aberration should be punished as a war crime or at least a species of torture.
I honestly believe that were we to strap your eyeballs to Zbigniew’s prose, you would run screaming from the premises, unless we had prudently tied you to a chair. The next time you feel like complaining about something you see in my columns, about my language or some joke, please remember that I am providing this onerous service at no extra charge.
Zbig Brother even excuses Stalin’s purges and mass murders. Page 134ff: “Yet though Stalinism may have been a needless tragedy for both the Russian people and communism as an ideal, there is the intellectually tantalizing possibility that for the world at large it was, as we shall see, a blessing in disguise. . . .” What? Yes. You see, “the internal violence employed by Stalin . . . had a restraining effect on unbridled nationalism.”
But isn’t Zbig today fanatically opposed to the continuing Soviet Union? Yes, he is, but not because he opposes Marxism. As we have seen, he is a lifelong Marxist. He opposes the Soviets precisely because he loves Marxism so much. He believes the Communists have misused it. He believes that he, Zbigniew Brzezinski, could impose it correctly, the way old Karl himself would have done it.
Enter David Rockefeller. David is a confessed traitor, a conspirator who is working in a secret cabal to destroy the United States. What? David Rockefeller? How do we know that? In 2002, Random House, in New York, published his Memoirs. Remember, this is not someone accusing him of something. This is David Rockefeller himself talking on page 405:
For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
Because this sleazy extrusion of an unmarried female canine is a traitor – because he loves totalitarianism – he was naturally attracted to lifelong Marxist Zbigniew Brzezinski. Zbig became David’s prime minister. In 1973, under David’s direction, Zbig formed the Trilateral Commission, which is the foreign ministry of the Council on Foreign Relations, a preeminent founder of which was Marxist Edward M. House.
Both these groups work tirelessly to promote world government, which would mean the abolition of our own. Remember, the United States government and world government are mutually exclusive. You can’t have them both at the same time. If you are working for the latter, you are trying to destroy the former.
In 1976, Zbig and David literally interviewed dour peanut farmer Jimmy Carter at David’s Tarrytown estate. They liked what they heard and installed Democrat Jimmy as President of the United States. From the beginning, Jimmy was a Rockefeller factotum. Zbig Brother was his National Security Adviser. Jimmy came close to wrecking our economy. Okay, but what does all this have to do with the 2008 campaign?
In the 2000 campaign, Zbigniew Brzezinski, lifelong Marxist, was foreign policy adviser to Senator John McCain, who said this: “I am honored that Zbigniew Brzezinski will join my foreign policy team. As a former national security adviser and a highly respected foreign policy expert, his broad experience makes him an invaluable asset to my team.” So Zbig went from Democrat Jimmy to Republican John. Remember that at the top – above the candidates – you have one party with two branches.
What about this year? This year, Zbig is back, running foreign policy for Hussein. Indeed, remember Mark, son of Zbig? Mark was one of the sons to whom Zbig dedicated Between Two Ages in 1970. Mark is all grown up now and shaving. Can you imagine? Mark is foreign policy adviser to Senator Hussein. So who is foreign policy adviser to Senator McCain this year? The envelope please! El Senador Juan McCain’s foreign policy adviser this year is Ian Brzezinski, the other Zbigniew son.
That is correct. Lifelong Marxist Zbigniew Brzezinski – David Rockefeller’s Prime Minister - controls both sides of the forthcoming charade through his sons. Again, you can relax. It really makes no difference who wins. The only difference will be a difference in style, a difference in personality, natural differences peculiar to us all. Remember, David Rockefeller admits, boasts, that he and his family exercise inordinate influence over the United States. This is how he does it.
Do you need to know anything more to understand that a literal conspiracy controls both main political parties, and that at the top – above the candidates – both parties are the same? What was that you said about “change?” Remember, Zbig ran foreign policy for McCain in the 2000 campaign. This year, Hussein is just as much a factotum of Goldman Sachs and other instrumentalities of world government as McCain.
Notice that our Communist media say nothing about this. They understand perfectly well that if they sass David Rockefeller they could lose their jobs. So they specialize in arguing about lesser fry. So, sure, vote next week, but do so with the assurance that it makes no difference; that the conspiracy for world government has already chosen our next President. He is Rockefeller prime minister and Marxist Zbigniew Brzezinski.
Long live Zbig Brother!
"Mark my words, it will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking... Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy." Joe Biden
Evidence obtained by the BBC in the breakaway region suggests Georgia used indiscriminate force, and may have targeted civilians.
Witnesses said tanks had fired on an apartment block, and civilians were shot at as they fled the fighting.
"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do." Bush White House aide explaining the "New Reality"
The New American Century lasted a decade. Financial crisis and defeated objectives in
The American neoconservatives are the heirs of Leon Trotsky. Their dream of American “Full Spectrum Dominance”—
The neocons used September 11, 2001, as a “new
Perhaps the neoconservative project for world hegemony would have lasted a bit longer had the neocons possessed intellectual competence.
On the war front, the incompetent neocons predicted that the
On the economic front, the incompetent neocons overlooked the fact that a country that relocates its industry and best jobs abroad in order to maximize short-run profits becomes progressively economically weaker. Propagandistic talk about a “New Economy” built around financial dominance covered up the fact that the
US military pretensions came to an end in
The ongoing financial crisis has put an end to the pretensions of American financial hegemony and free-market illusions that deregulation and offshoring had brought prosperity to
In a long article, “The End of Arrogance,” on September 30, the German news magazine Der Spiegel observed:
"This is no longer the muscular and arrogant
Also on display is the end of arrogance. The Americans are now paying the price for their pride.
Gone are the days when the
A new chapter in economic history has begun, one in which the
Looking at his defeated adversary, George W. Bush, brought down by military and economic failure, Iranian President Ahmadinejad observed: “The American empire in the world is reaching the end of its road, and its next rulers must limit their interference to their own borders.”
Truer words were never spoken.
October 28, 2008
Comment: I am truly glad to see there are still some really honorable police officers still around. We need you now more than ever.
Like most police officers in America, I have thus far found myself immune to the many and varied charms of Barack Obama. Cops, regardless of their political affiliation, tend to be conservative, certainly few more so than I. Furthermore, we can spot a con job, and though Senator Obama has a smoother delivery than most who have risen from the fetid pond of Chicago politics, he nonetheless strikes me as a man who, should I find myself in his company, would have me checking for my wallet and watch after he had gone.
But a strange thing happens to a cop once he sets himself to the task or advancing through the ranks of his police department: He becomes less influenced by concerns of enforcing the law and more preoccupied with hewing to the regnant politics of the city in which he serves. As a friend very aptly describes the process, a cop forfeits one vertebra with each promotion he achieves, with the sad result often being that by the time he is appointed chief of police he is no longer fit to be classified among the phylum Chordata.
Witness the metamorphosis of Los Angeles Police Department chief William Bratton. Once decorated for valor while serving as a young police officer in Boston, he has, over the course of his ascent to law enforcement prominence, surrendered his vertebrae to various pols in Boston, New York, and Los Angeles, adapting like a remora feeding on the scraps left behind by whichever larger fish he found himself following. While in the employ of former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, for example, Bratton was the tough-talking commissioner of the NYPD, bringing about a truly remarkable drop in crime in a city that had been descending into state of lawless chaos.
Though his success in reducing crime in Los Angeles has been only slightly less dramatic, gone is the shoot-from-the-lip Bill Bratton who struck fear into the hearts of Times Square hookers, squeegee-wielding bums, and all other strata of New York’s criminal rabble. Today, Bratton is a more soft-spoken man, conveniently reflecting the politics of a city where virtually the entire municipal government is made up of people of the Left.
But with Bratton’s latest act of political calculation and expediency, he has handed over whatever meager fragments of a spine that might have remained, to the point that it is now a wonder the man can stand upright at all. Last Friday, the Los Angeles Times reported that Bratton had recorded a telephone message to be used in “robocalls” in support of Barack Obama’s campaign for president. And what a shame this is.
October 27, 2008
Perhaps the only institution in America whose approval rating is beneath that of Congress is the media.
Both have won their reputations the hard way. They earned them.
Consider the fawning indulgence shown insider Joe Biden with the dripping contempt visited on outsider Sarah Palin.
Twice last weekend, Biden grimly warned at closed-door meetings that a great crisis is coming early in the term of President Obama:
“Mark my words. It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. … Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said … we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”
A “generated crisis”? By whom? Moscow? Beijing? Teheran?
This is an astonishing statement from a chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee who has access to the same intelligence as George Bush. Joe was warning of a crisis like the Berlin Wall of July 1961, where JFK called for a tripling of the draft and ordered a call-up of reserves, or the missile crisis where U.S. pilots like John McCain were minutes away from bombing nuclear missile sites in Cuba and killing the Russians manning them.
Is Russia about to move on the Crimea? Is Israel about to launch air strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites? What is Joe talking about?
If one assumes Joe is a serious man, we have a right to know.
Instead, what we got was Obama’s airy dismissal of Joe’s words as a “rhetorical flourish” and a media — rather than demanding that Joe hold a press conference — acting as Obama surrogates parroting the talking points that Joe was just saying that new presidents always face tests.
Had John McCain made that hair-raising statement, he would have been accused of fear mongering about a new 9/11. The media would have run with the story rather than have smothered it.
Contrasting McCain with his hero, Joe declared a few weeks back, “When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and … said, ‘Look, here’s what happened.’”
Nice historical reference. Except when the market crashed in 1929, Hoover was president, and there was no television.
Can one imagine what the press would have done to Sarah Palin had she exhibited such ignorance of history. Or Dan Quayle?
Joe gets a pass because everybody likes Joe.
Fine. But Joe also has a record of 36 years in the Senate.
Has anyone ever asked Joe about his own and his party’s role in cutting off aid to South Vietnam, leading to the greatest strategic defeat in U.S. history and the Cambodian holocaust? Has anyone ever asked Joe about the role he and his party played in working to block Reagan’s deployment of Pershing missiles in Europe, and SDI, which Gorbachev concedes broke the Soviets and won the Cold War?
In the most crucial vote he ever cast — to give Bush a blank check for war in Iraq — Joe concedes he got it wrong.
Is Joe’s record of having been wrong on Vietnam, wrong in the Cold War, wrong on the Iraq War, less important than whether Sarah Palin tried to get fired a rogue-cop brother-in-law who Tasered her 10-year old nephew to “teach him a lesson”?
“I’ve forgotten more about foreign policy than most of my colleagues know,” says Joe humbly. Given his record, it is understandable Joe has forgotten so much of it.
Saturday, the New York Times did a takeout on Cindy McCain that delved back into her problem with prescription pills. Yet when Hillary’s campaign manager, Mark Penn, brought up Obama’s cocaine use on “Hardball,” he was savaged by folks for whom the Times is the gold standard.
The people apparently had a “right to know” of Bush’s old DUI arrest a week before the 2000 election, but no right to know about how and when Obama was engaged in the criminal use of cocaine.
The media cannot get enough of the “Saturday Night Live” impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina Fey clips and run them and run them to the merriment of all.
Can one imagine “Saturday Night Live” doing weekly send-ups of Michelle Obama and her “I’ve never been proud” of my country, this “just downright mean” America, using a black comedienne to mimic and mock her voice and accent?
“Saturday Night Live” would be facing hate crime charges.
How do we know? When the New Yorker ran a cartoon of Michelle in an Angela-Davis afro with an AK-47 slung over her shoulder, New Yorker editors had to go on national television to swear they were not mocking Michelle, but the conservatives who have so caricatured Michelle and The Messiah.
Is there a media double standard? You betcha.
Tags: Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John McCain, Sarah Palin
October 24, 2008
I have never seen anything like this. The adjusted monetary base over the last eight weeks has risen at 341% per annum. The increase in the monetary base is $300 billion
Texas Congressman Ron Paul has blasted former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan, calling him "intellectually arrogant" after he blamed free market capitalism for the current financial crisis and diverted questions away from his own actions.
"I think he's trying to save his place in history but I don't think he's going to achieve it unless he confesses and goes back to his roots and goes back to writing articles for Ayn Rand." Paul told Neil Cavuto on Fox Business yesterday evening.
"There's no way he's going to escape the blame for this, I guess I am shocked also that he pretends he is shocked too." Paul, a member of the House Committee on Financial Services, commented.
Greenspan yesterday described the current financial crisis as a "once-in-a-century credit tsunami" and blamed flaws in the workings of the free-market system, something he said had left him in a "state of shocked disbelief".
"What I really resent about it is that he knows and understood at one time what capitalism was all about. He went and distorted it," Ron Paul urged.
"Now he says 'this is the death of capitalism and what we need now are really really good regulations on derivatives.' No, we need to remove the system that creates derivatives."
Paul asserted that the Federal Reserve chairman, whoever it may be, does not have the wisdom to regulate monetary policy because they are driven to excess and are part of an inherently flawed system.
"In a way they are intellectually arrogant because they believe that only they know what the market knows. Nobody knows what the proper rate of interest is, it's always too high or too low." Paul said
Watch the interview:
The Congressman also made an appearance on CNN this morning:
“There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I was somehow obligated to this community and would utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit this community first and foremost. “ - Michelle Obama (College Thesis Paper)
By Michelle’s own admission, her thesis survey was so radical only 22% of the Princeton Alumni she gave it to where willing to fill it out.
Barack Obama on the other hand has refused to show anyone his thesis paper, reporters can not find a single copy anywhere, and Columbia is refusing to let the public view it until after the election! We only know that it is about the Soviet Union! A group of journalists even placed ads in Columbia’s student paper asking for copies, to no avail.
From Obama’s two (semi-fictional) “autobiographical” works.
“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” - Brarack Obama
“The person who made me proudest of all, though, was [half brother] Roy Actually, now we call him Abongo, his Luo name, for two years ago he decided to reassert his African heritage. He converted to Islam.” - Barack Obama
“We are no longer just a Christian nation,” - Barack Obama
“I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites” - Barack Obama
“never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa, that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.” - Barack Obama
“It remained necessary to prove which side you were on,to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names” - Barack Obama
”I FOUND A SOLACE IN NURSING A PERVASIVE SENSE OF GRIEVANCE AND ANIMOSITY AGAINST MY MOTHER’S RACE”. - Barack Obama
A mum-of-three who was the victim of a horrific rape in Belfast has spoken for the first time about her nightmare ordeal — to warn other woman of the risk of such an attack.
Mary Hodkinson is facing an agonising wait to see if she contracted Aids in the brutal incident which occurred in a house in south Belfast earlier this month.
After the horrendous sex attack, Mary was thrown out on the street bleeding, battered and semi-naked.
She also fears the sickening sex attack may have been filmed.
A 31-year-old foreign national has already appeared in court in connection with the incident.
9:54 pm Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
Gov. Linda Lingle, R-Hawaii
Welcome to Western Voices, I'm John Young of European Americans United. Back on October 12th, European Americans United held its first national conference. Because of the unique nature of our approach, the highlight of our conference was a brainstorming session; during which conference participants broke up into small groups to put forward ideas for moving our objectives forward. Then, the Board of Directors selected the most workable ideas from those, and presented that list to the assembled membership for a vote, and also to ascertain which members present would take ownership of those ideas to make them a reality.
Not all of our members could make the conference – due to family commitments, work commitments or for other reasons. What follows is a speech that I delivered at that conference, changed just a little bit to make it suitable as a podcast. I'm delivering this so that all of our membership knows why we support Chuck Baldwin, and the Chuck Baldwin and Derrell Castle ticket, for President of the United States.
Everybody here already knows the kind of slop that the Republican and Democratic parties have dished up for our consideration. It's the same slop they dish up for every election, just with different name tags. The only difference is that every time the slop becomes more rancid, putrescent and more difficult to swallow without gagging.
The two representatives of major political parties are, indeed, a sickening sight. They differ only in degree, not in substance, on everything. They are just two different faces representing the same oligarchy. They don't even debate major issues like illegal immigration because the folks pulling their strings have decided that such issues are off the table; and all McCain and Obama are allowed to discuss is the proper orientation of deck chairs on the Titanic while pointedly ignoring the lookout screaming that we need to turn full starboard to avoid a looming iceberg ahead.
WEST HOLLYWOOD (CBS News) ― Sarah Palin is not considered to be a friend of the gay community, but the Republican vice presidential candidate seems to be looming over the West Hollywood Halloween Carnival.
First, a rumor got started that city officials were going to ban Sarah Palin drag queens at its upcoming costumed street party, which draws some 500,000 people annually.
The rumor turned out to be false, but tonight comes word that a mannequin has been outfitted to look like Palin -- with glasses, a beehive wig and a red business suit -- and is hanging from a noose outside a WeHo residence.
He seemed like the most unlikely of suspects - a teenage boy known by most as a quiet violinist, a kid whose heroes were classical musicians.
But on Friday, Portsmouth police announced they had arrested 17-year-old Robert Lee Barnes in the slaying of Meghan Landowski, a Woodrow Wilson High School student whose April 10 death at home in the middle of the afternoon had shocked and scared her peers and the community.
Barnes, of the 600 block of Lancer Drive, faces charges of first-degree murder and burglary. At his arraignment in Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court Friday morning, Commonwealth's Attorney Earle Mobley said he plans to try the teen as an adult.
But about two weeks ago, Berry got disturbing news from local election officials.
"This office has received notification from the state of Georgia indicating that you are not a citizen of the United States and therefore, not eligible to vote," a letter from the Fulton County Department of Registration and Elections said.But Berry is a U.S. citizen, born in Boston, Massachusetts. She has a passport and a birth certificate to prove it.
October 26, 2008
If you look more closely… it appears that the image makers and the rule setters in the federal government and in the media are having to scramble in order to maintain what was once an easy operation, all of which was based on political correctness; but not anymore.
By Frank Roman and A.J. Marsh
One thing that troubles so many people today, including the authors of today’s podcast, is the scheme known as Political Correctness. While some average Americans basically understand the boiled down concept behind these two words, more often than not in humorous terms, what we actually have in abundance today as a result of PC is political and social stagnation and decay. The uncomplicated fact is that people are mentally frozen in wretched fear for offending someone of the other “party.” The fearful truth lies in the verifiable fact that PC as a technique was originated by the Frankfurt School Marxists who immigrated to the United States to flee the Nazis at the outbreak of World War II. According to more than a few scholars and researchers, the work of the Frankfurt School was aimed at undermining Western values by influencing popular culture through Cultural Marxism. Patrick J. Buchanan says in his book The Death of the West: "Political Correctness is Cultural Marxism, a regime to punish dissent and to stigmatize social heresy as the Inquisition punished religious heresy. Its trademark is intolerance."(p. 89).
By Cooper Sterling
A Barack Obama presidency now seems inevitable. So the hard-left policies of his Administration on education compel urgent consideration.
Given Obama’s emphasis on greater funding for education, he could leave a real mark—and further entrench an increasingly radical faction of cultural Marxists within
[Previously by Nicholas Stix: The Knoxville Horror: Crime, Race, The Media, And “Anti-Racism” ]
In the first Knoxville Horror trial in April, Eric Dewayne “E” Boyd was convicted by a federal jury in
The carjacking was the first in a chain of crimes, including kidnapping, assault, theft, multiple forms of gang rape, torture, murder and corpse desecration committed in Knoxville on January 7, 2007, variously against Channon Christian, 21, and her boyfriend, Christopher Newsom, 23, that U.S Attorney James R. Dedrick recently called “one of, if not the most, horrendous crimes ever committed in Knoxville, Tennessee.”
The victims were white; Boyd and the four murder defendants are all black. The authorities and the MSM long insisted that the crime had no racial motivation. They condemned as “white supremacists” all critics (including yours truly) who maintained otherwise. In a major concession in April, however, Knoxville News-Sentinel reporter Jamie Satterfield, who has covered the case more than any other journalist, and who previously expressed hostility towards critics suggesting a racial motivation, wrote neutrally that it “has gained notoriety as a black-on-white crime.”
Boyd was charged with hiding alleged carjacking ringleader Lemaricus “Slim” Davidson from the police after the murders. Boyd insisted that he had had nothing to do with the gang rape-torture-murders, and did not know of them at the time. He has not been charged in their commission, or as an accomplice to them.
And yet Judge Varlan still had a huge mess to clean up. It remains to be seen if he succeeded.
"What Varlan did Wednesday was as bold as it is rare. Federal judges rarely impose maximum, consecutive sentencing.
He did so unapologetically, citing Boyd’s history as a lifelong criminal who in 1994 embarked on a violent robbery spree that included the attempted murder of a witness and, once behind bars, assaults on other inmates and threats to prison guards.
'Simply put, the defendant shows a lack of regard for the law,' Varlan said. 'Even when the defendant has been incarcerated for breaking the law, he has failed to follow the law.' "[Boyd sentenced to maximum time; He gets 18 years for hiding suspect in couple’s slaying, By Jamie Satterfield , Knoxville News-Sentinel,
In his defense, Boyd argued, “I'm asking for the mercy of the court. I didn't have to do this, but I did it to make sure this man [Davidson] didn't hurt nobody else.”
The sentence is a mixed bag. On the plus side, the judge reversed years of the negligence by the prison system’s stewards, who never punished Boyd for crimes and misconduct he committed while inside.
On the minus side, Varlan violated the established understanding of co-operation by a defendant.
Back in 1994, Boyd “admitted” (the term formerly known as “confessed”) to committing, among other crimes, nine robberies over the course of two months, in a plea deal which got him a sentence of only 20 years for the robberies, and dismissal of numerous other crimes, including attempted murder.
But the family of his white crime partner, Ernest Boyd Collier III, hired a fancy lawyer, who got him some fancy justice—eight years of probation, with no time inside.
Boyd had already made an anticipatory charge of racism before making his deal. He found receptive judges on
Boyd’s present attorney, Phil Lomonaco, argued that, since Boyd had told the authorities where Davidson was hiding, he had provided them with invaluable assistance, and therefore deserved leniency. Lomanaco asked for a sentence not to exceed four years. Judge Varlan countered that Boyd had only helped the authorities because he had already been caught, and thus deserved no consideration.
Boyd’s professions of altruism and Varlan’s skepticism notwithstanding, criminals do not help the authorities out of the goodness of their hearts.
An interagency fugitive task force was able to locate and quickly take Davidson into custody without a struggle, based solely on Boyd’s cooperation. A hard case like Boyd would never have cooperated, had he known that there was no payoff.
The three main ways that criminals get put away are through community cooperation, aggressive police work, and bad guys “flipping” on each other.
Lemaricus Davidson was released from prison in August 2006, after serving a token sentence for a previous carjacking and robbery conviction. He then allegedly spent the next four months-and-change on a wave of robberies with Boyd, his alleged crime partner, who allegedly also committed some stickups with Davidson’s half-brother, Letalvis “
Prior to the murders, the black community, perhaps following the “don’t snitch” rule, was of no help in catching the suspects. And though Davidson’s white girlfriend, Daphne Sutton, testified at Boyd’s trial that she knew Davidson was doing stickups, she not only never alerted the police, but lied to them for hours, hindering their search for him.
That leaves bad guys betraying each other as the only effective crime-fighting tool. But if Judge Varlan’s precedent spreads through the grapevine, that option may dry up, as well.
Judge Varlan repeatedly cited the pre-sentencing report of federal Probation Officer Myra Melton Buffalo, as justification for the sentence he meted out to Boyd.
Judge Varlan argued that, since Boyd had confessed to 1994 robberies that were dismissed, but the federal sentencing guidelines had insufficiently counted those “criminal history points,” a lenient sentence would let him off too easily in the instant case, and thus that he deserved the maximum sentence.
Lomonaco, who said he will appeal, will surely challenge that argument.
The biggest legal problem with the Boyd trial was its timing. Boyd was convicted as an accessory to a crime allegedly committed by someone (Davidson) who has yet to be convicted for said crime. That required pre-empting the presumption of innocence regarding Davidson. Cart, horse.
And Davidson is unlikely ever to be tried for the carjacking. He is scheduled to be tried next June on 47 state charges, including rape and murder. Presumably, convictions and a death sentence would moot the federal charges of carjacking.
The scheduled state trials of the other four defendants on rape, murder, and other charges are: Letalvis Cobbins (
Now Boyd will be more certain than ever that he is a victim of racism. It's hard out here for a stickup man.
Our legal system was not designed to deal with offenders like Eric Boyd, with their multitudinous crimes and mitigating circumstances.
The more “diverse” America becomes, the more it will be comprised of hostile communities who refuse to police themselves, the more police will be handcuffed, the more common Knoxville-style atrocities will become—and the more commonly judges will face issues that King Solomon himself couldn’t see his way through.