January 9, 2008

Voter Fraud Against Ron Paul Verified

Voter Fraud Against Paul Confirmed in Sutton, N.H.
According to a post this evening on the Ron Paul Forums, vote fraud occurred in Sutton, New Hampshire:

Sutton with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton posted:
My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn’t corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???
Read More Here...

I was extremely sickened by the possible ramifications of these timorous developments and I was quite upset at Ron Paul's low polling numbers at the New Hampshire caucus, but I was ready to move on and hit South Carolina hard with campaigning. Now we are in for quite a battle to get a recount done, and this has lit a new fire in my belly. I came to the realization that this is the first battle of the R[3VOL]UTION. This is the time where we will be tested. Tested in our resolve, tested in our dedication. Let this injustice fan the flames of freedom and liberty in your hearts. We have not yet begun to fight!

I held off on posting this until it could be confirmed, and it has been. Today on Alex Jones' radio show he had a woman named Bev Harris, of blackboxvoting.org, as a guest. Bev Harris confirmed with the Sutton, New Hampshire clerk that Ron Paul did in fact receive 31 votes, and not 0 as reported in the polls.
Alex Jones' site and article about this development.
Bev Harris was also a consultant for the HBO's 'Hacking Democracy'.


winkswink said...

Bev Harris is a true American hero.

The Diebold machines used in NH were the subject of "Hacking Democracy." I can possibly hook you up with an off-air recording if you are interested.

Interesting note: Nancy Tobi on blackboxvoting.org points out that a simple recount is not advised. You could be playing into Diebold's hand. Without looking at the trail of how votes were hijacked, you will be letting the criminals off the hook and playing into their hands when you confirm a recount that is based upon fraud.

Bev Harris and her crew are the experts. The Kucinich campaign, and all other well-intentioned campaigns should proceed only after consultation with them, imho.

Volksgeist said...

I agree, good point. What Bev stated was that in order for them to report 0 votes in that town, they had to be totaled up, and them omitted when sending out the media brief. So somewhere between adding up 31 votes and then sending out the final report, somebody intentionally left out those results. She cites this as one of the chief ways hand counted votes are defrauded.